Users
Two hundred and twelve adults in Kuubalainen nainen heterosexual relationships (106 women, Mmany years = years; 106 men, Mage age = years) and two hundred and eight adults in same-gender relationships (72 couples self-identified as gay: Mage = 34.1 years; 72 couples self-identified as lesbian: Mage = 33.3 years years). Couples were required to have been together romantically for a minimum of 6 months and to come to the lab with their partner to participate in the study. The average relationship length for all couples was 4.8 years (SD = 6.6 years). Exclusion criteria limited participation to individuals currently without serious, chronic health problems or any health issues (e.g., diabetes) that affected their eating behaviors. (If participants engaged in disordered eating behaviors but did not conceptualize them as disordered, they may have participated).
The participants when you look at the heterosexual relationship was indeed mostly European Western (72% Eu Western, 10% Dark colored, 8% Hispanic/Latino, 7% Far-eastern Western, and you may 3% “other”). People said personal earnings inside the ranges: “ $75,000” (1%). While doing so, 41.1% stated that they were relationships rather than cohabitating, thirty-two.4% reported that they were cohabitating (managing both), and twenty-six.5% stated that these people were married.
The participants when you look at the lgbt dating was indeed including predominantly European-American (70%; 14% Ebony, 10% Hispanic/Latino, 3% Far-eastern Western, 3% “other”). Professionals said individual earnings in range: “ 0 suggests particular amount of dissatisfaction. The exam–retest accuracy because of it scale could have been considered a great [0.79; (33)], and that level has been discovered getting predictive validity [elizabeth.g., it’s of pounds condition and you can weight reduction behaviors in other adult products; (34, 35)].
Dating Top quality
The new Marital Relations Survey [MIS; (36)] was applied to assess participants’ matchmaking quality. That it fifteen-item level consists of one or two subscales away from like and you can conflict. The fresh love level queried professionals playing with ten issues along with “How the time do you end up being on the your ex?” Brand new conflict measure queried members using five points including “How many times could you and your mate argue with one another?” Each item was rated on the a 9-part Likert level regarding 0 = “definitely not” to eight = “really.” Affairs determining disagreement was in fact contrary coded (thus evaluating “harmony”) and a complete element rating off matchmaking quality are determined. The initial style of the MIS was created to determine married couples’ matchmaking quality; the brand new scale are changed for it analysis to see “spouse” and “partner,” in place of “mate.” The brand new MIS are legitimate across the subsamples of lovers (?s = 0.77–0.89) and also come utilized efficiently in other training off same-sex lovers, revealing predictive validity [age.grams., (19)].
Relationship Length
People advertised their relationships size from the reacting: “For how almost a year are you presently consistently involved in their close mate?” Answers are displayed in many years for smoother interpretation.
Covariates
Analyses considered covariates almost certainly from the putting on weight and you can dating updates: ages, participants’ gender (coded ?1 = male, step one = female), and you can sexual direction. (Gender and you may sexual orientation as well as was basically thought to be moderators when you look at the analyses).
Analytical Plan
SPSS adaptation twenty-eight and you may HLM type eight were utilized getting descriptive analyses and take to study seeks. Investigation have been featured getting completeness; the level of destroyed analysis into any variable utilized in analyses ranged away from 0 to 1.4%. Listwise removal was utilized to possess missing research. To take into account the new low-freedom of information off somebody nested within this dating, multilevel modeling was used to check on getting gender and you can sexual direction differences in in this-couples parameters and to sample analysis aims (37). Carried on parameters were class imply based in the height step 1 (within-couples) and grand indicate dependent on level 2 (between-couples).